The MICCAI review process is based on the guidelines prepared by the MICCAI Board of Directors in order to ensure consistency over the MICCAI conference series. If you have questions please contact

The review is performed by two committees:

Each PC member acts both as a Primary and a Secondary PC member:

Note that terms “Primary” and “Secondary” do not represent their intuitive meanings. They just mean two different roles. Separating the above two roles may look complicated, but ensures to eliminate the bias in the recommendation of PC members by knowing the identity of the authors as much as possible.

The outline of the process and expected timeline is as follows:

PC member tasks